Welcome to the Disability Justice Guide! This guide includes recommended readings on topics related to disability justice as well as sample lesson plans on how to incorporate disability studies and disability justice into information literacy instruction.
1. Students will be able to explain 'the hierarchy of credibility' and assess representation or lack of representation of disabled people in news media sources.
2. Students will identify the problems that arise when important perspectives are left out of the narrative by analyzing a source that centers medical professionals and a source that centers disabled people.
3. Students will be able to describe why it is important to seek out perspectives of those who are most affected by events but may not appear in news stories.
1. Introductory Activity: Looking at the authority of a source. How do you know when an author is credible?
2. Mini Lecture on how the news and academic publishing often focus on 'experts.' Discussion of 'hierarchy of credibility'. When news stories discuss new legislation, who do we hear from? When does trusting experts backfire? What do we learn when we listen to those most affected?
3. Activity Idea #1: Look at the following readings from The Disability Visibility Project and The New York Times.
-Take notes as you read the articles and then answer the following questions:
4. Activity Idea #2: Search a news aggregator (e.g. Google News or Apple News) for disability legislation, such as The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) or Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA).
5. Activity Idea #3: Find a writer on the Disabled Writers website and look more into some of their works. Share their perspective and a few examples of their works with the class.
6. Takeaways from the lesson. Why is it important for us to think about who may be missing from a story? Why should we seek out perspectives of those most affected by something that the news is reporting?
Knowledge Practices
- Understand how and why some individuals or groups of individuals may be underrepresented or systematically marginalized within the systems that produce and disseminate information.
- Experts also understand that value may be wielded by powerful interests that marginalize certain voices.